extensions

OCFL Community Extension 0008: Schema Registry

Overview

An OCFL object will typically contain metadata serialised in JSON or XML files. These nominally conform to one or more schemata referenced as external JSONSchema/XSD/DTD files.

In order for an OCFL root to represent a self-contained repository, the specific versions of each schema referenced must be available in order to validate the content of OCFL objects. It is currently assumed that such schemata are maintained independently in external files and remain accessible via URLs. However, maintaining a local copy of schemata within the OCFL root is essential where long-term preservation is a goal. External online references must not be relied upon in the long-term, due to the possibility of evolution of technical ecosystems and of organizational change.

This extension stores a single copy of each schema referenced by the content of OCFL objects within the root: it avoids the need to store a copy of schemata redundantly in each OCFL object. It also provides a convenient reference point for archive management software and future users inspecting the contents of the OCFL object.

We describe a standardised layout for a schema directory (hereinafter schema registry), where this extension stores all schemata referenced throughout the OCFL root. This schema registry must be implemented by creating and maintaining the following items:

Example file content and structures are shown in the Examples section below.

Parameters

Configuration is done by setting values in config.json at the top level of the extension’s directory. The keys expected are:

An example config.json in included in the Examples section below.

schema_inventory.json

A manifest of the registered schemata must be maintained in schema_inventory.json. Implementations of this extension must treat integrity verification of the stored schemata with the same priority as all primary OCFL objects.

manifest entry properties for schema_inventory.json

Implementation

In an OCFL root where this extension is configured, tools reading the OCFL objects may be aware of local copies of schemata. Accessing local schemata may reduce latency and provide a performance benefit. Thus, OCFL reading applications relying on schemata (eg for validation) may wish to read these from the schema registry.

A process must be implemented which ensures all OCFL objects/versions written are checked for schema references. Where not already registered, the schema must be retrieved and registered as described below. Since schemata are typically identified by the URL of the specific version referenced, the digest of the schema’s identifier (as configured by identifierDigestAlgorithm) must be used as a filename. MD5 may be sufficient, other algorithms may be configured.

The values of digestAlgorithm and identifierDigestAlgorithm should not be changed once the registry is initialised. If changing the digest is unavoidable, all existing entries in the registry must be updated to the new algorithm(s).

Two possible implementation cases are considered:

Where an OCFL root is being generated as a snapshot for export or archival purposes.

In this case, it is reasonable to build or check the completeness of the schema registry as each OCFL object is processed for backup. Then the exported root will contain all necessary schemata.

Where an OCFL root provides the persistence layer for a live repository

In this case, a background process may discover or be informed of any new OCFL objects/versions. This process can asynchronously process the object contents, retrieve the required schemata and perform necessary registrations with the schema registry.

The values of digestAlgorithm and identifierDigestAlgorithm should not be changed once the registry is initialised. If changing the digest is unavoidable, all existing entries in the registry must be updated to the new algorithm(s).

Registering a schema with the extension

Example

Given OCFL objects:

item1
with descriptive metadata in content/item1.xml
<!DOCTYPE rdf:RDF SYSTEM "http://dublincore.org/specifications/dublin-core/dcmes-xml/2001-04-11/dcmes-xml-dtd.dtd">
...
item2
with descriptive metadata in content/item2.json
{
  "$schema" : "http://schemata.hasdai.org/historic-persons/historic-person-entry-v1.0.0.json"
...

An example state of the registry is shown below, with local copies of the named schemata stored with their derived filenames

config.json

{
  "extensionName" : "0008-schema-registry",
  "identifierDigestAlgorithm": "md5",
  "digestAlgorithm" : "sha512"
}

schema_inventory.json

{
  "manifest" : {
    "40cdd53d9a263e5466b8954d82d23daa" : {
     "digest" : "91da2b...9c8",
     "identifier" : "http://dublincore.org/specifications/dublin-core/dcmes-xml/2001-04-11/dcmes-xml-dtd.dtd"
    },
    "95d751340dcdc784fd759dbc7ddb9633" : {
     "digest" : "31f53b...7ff",
     "identifier" : "http://schemata.hasdai.org/historic-persons/historic-person-entry-v1.0.0.json"
    }
  }
}

OCFL root tree

[storage_root]
  ├── 0=ocfl_1.0
  ├── ocfl_1.0.txt
  ├── ocfl_layout.json
  ├── extensions
  │   └── 0008-schema-registry
  │       └── config.json
  |       └── schema_inventory.json
  |       └── schema_inventory.json.sha512
  │       └── schemata
  │           └── 40cdd53d9a263e5466b8954d82d23daa
  │           └── 95d751340dcdc784fd759dbc7ddb9633
  ├── 0de
  |   └── 45c
  |       └── f24
  |           └── item1
  │               └── 0=ocfl_object_1.0
  │                   └── inventory.json
  │                   └── inventory.json.sha512
  │                   └── v1
  │                       └── inventory.json
  │                       └── inventory.json.sha512
  │                       └── content
  │                           └── item1.xml
  ...